Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 79

Thread: Running Back: Need or not?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Chiba
    Posts
    5,383
    Rep Power
    279545

    Default Running Back: Need or not?

    I hear a great many people talk about Blount not being able to be in on 3rd down... about opposing teams knowing to key run if he is in the game...

    Given a look at his stats it would appear that he got better from 2010 to 2011 in that respect, but is it good enough?

    2011:
    rushing: 184 781 4.2
    receiving: 15 148 9.9

    2010:
    rushing: 201 1,007 5.0
    receiving: 5 14 2.8

    He had four fumbles in 2010 and five in 2012 with three lost in both years.

    Certainly his receiving improved statistically.

    I think looking at the situational stats might reveal some better clarity in the discussion as well.

    Looking at those one of my concerns is the lack of production in the first half in 2011. In 2010 he averaged 5.4yds per carry in the 1st half of games and in 2011 that was a pedestrian 3.5yds per carry. The numbers are better in the second half, but in a great many games teams were focused on the pass since the Buccaneers were trailing in most games.

    For my part I was happy with what I saw on the field with the passing game, but I still have issues with the fact that he looks tentative to hit the hole. Dude is a monster... and I would think hitting the hole hard would spring a few more yards from him than the lateral movement.

    I would like to see some other option than Lumpkin though... the team really did not have any other threat. Getting the team back to WD40 type options would be ideal IMHO.
    SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue > 0
    0 rows returned

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Tallahassee, FL
    Posts
    4,995
    Rep Power
    722256

    Default

    Running Back: Need or not?
    Oh gawd, yes! With Graham's status unceratin and Lumpkin barely good enough to play Arena League ball, this position is a definite need for upgrading. Namely -- we need some speed.....and more depth.

    I'm not giving up on Blount -- dude is a bruiser who has produced well. His sudden fumbling can be coached away -- geez, even Alstott once had three fumbles in a single game. I like him. But the Bucs could use a good change-of-pace speed back (give me LaMichael James!) who can take it to the house anywhere from the field. The team should definitely use a decent draft pick for a good RB.

    All IMHO, of course.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Toledo
    Posts
    27,147
    Rep Power
    915858

    Default

    Definite need we need some speed in the backfield to go along with Blount

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    126
    Rep Power
    2099

    Default

    Bring caddy back and draft lamichael. Done.

    Or drafting Richardson would most def help... But Claiborne is a bigger need @ 5

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    145
    Rep Power
    10003

    Default

    Absolutely a need. Blount would be so much better with a good change of pace RB. He's not complete enough to be a featured RB

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    11,839
    Rep Power
    489130

    Default

    We need an upgrade. Bringing Caddy is fine for depth but the Bucs need a Sproles style speedster that can block as well. One of the reasons why WD 40 worked is that both guys could protect the QB and catch passes. Alstott and Pittman were a pretty good tandem as well.

    I would like to see Blouunt learn how to block. The guy is big enough to lay a hurting on someone coming in. When Caddy first came in the NFL, he was a terrible blocker on third down. By 2009, it became one of his strengths as a RB. Caddy was able to pick up that skill despite two consecutive seasons of torn ACLs in 2007 and 2008. And Caddy was not the good receiver in his rookie season as he is now. Blount has been healthy. There is no excuse for him not picking up these skills.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    7,179
    Rep Power
    291622

    Default

    There's absolutely no question. RB, DB, and LB are the Bucs 3 priorities.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Bradenton, FL
    Posts
    1,332
    Rep Power
    32895

    Default

    Yes, we need a speedy type back who can get open in the passing game........LaMichael James or Rainey, etc.

    Bringing back Caddy, I don't see happening. If they work with Blount this offseason with blocking and catching, it will boost our playbook and screw other teams with defense planning.

    We have some other needs and it's all on D.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Toledo
    Posts
    27,147
    Rep Power
    915858

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Rich McKay Conspiracy View Post
    There's absolutely no question. RB, DB, and LB are the Bucs 3 priorities.
    A fast receiver that can catch the ball would be nice also we need to stretch the field every now and again

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    8,020
    Rep Power
    1769257

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NNUD28 View Post
    A fast receiver that can catch the ball would be nice also we need to stretch the field every now and again
    Jaquez Green?

    Oh wait, you said someone who could catch.

    Speaking of green, several years ago, some dumbass here claimed Green would be in teh top ten among all receivers in the NFL in yardage when he went to Washington to play in the Spurrier debacle. If I remember correctly, Green was so bad in Washington he finished the season in Detroit, about 1,100 yards short of the top ten.

    Now that I think of it, that welching piece of snook never paid that bet either.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    55
    Rep Power
    10005

    Default

    No way a RB @ 5. Every RB is one hit from being out of the NFL. The only positions that warrant that high a selection are QB, OT, DT, DE and CB. That is why if Kahil falls to us a 5, grab him. If he is not availble then CB. We don't need a QB and there is not a DT or DE worthy of a 5 in this draft. Get our speed RB in 3 or 4.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Tallahassee, FL
    Posts
    861
    Rep Power
    234140

    Default

    Scary thing is, every need or not type thread actually has a good arguement for it. I think the shortlist is what positions are the Bucs not in a need situation.
    Why have throwback jerseys when you can have a throwback team. Playoff Bucs, R.I.P.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    2,871
    Rep Power
    321756

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ufofreek View Post
    No way a RB @ 5. Every RB is one hit from being out of the NFL. The only positions that warrant that high a selection are QB, OT, DT, DE and CB.
    Every RB is one hit away from being out of the NFL, but other football positions are exempt from that rule??

    Try telling that to Joe Theismann:

    Theismann's career ended on November 18, 1985 when he suffered a comminuted compound fracture of his leg while being sacked by New York Giants linebackers Lawrence Taylor
    Or offensive lineman Mike Utley:

    Utley was an offensive lineman with the Detroit Lions, picked in the third round of the 1989 NFL Draft. In his rookie year, Utley became the starting right guard for the Lions. He started the first five games, but was injured in the fifth game against the Minnesota Vikings. Utley was put on injured reserve for the rest of the year.

    In his third year, Utley started every game and was the full time right guard until a paralysis injury forced him to retire. An injury to his sixth and seventh cervical vertebrae occurred in a game against the LA Rams on November 17, 1991. Although he would later learn he was largely paralyzed from the chest down.
    Or linebacker Reggie Brown:

    Brown was selected 17th overall by the Detroit Lions in the 1996 NFL Draft. He had a rather short career, playing only 32 games.

    In his final game, Brown suffered a spinal cord contusion while assisting on a tackle of New York Jets halfback Adrian Murrell in the closing game of 1997 season.
    We took Gaines Adams with the #4 overall pick in the '07 draft because that was our biggest need. We passed on Adrian Peterson, who went #7 to Minnesota. A good move?

    I'm not saying you always take running backs high, but when there's a special, complete back, and you don't have one currently on your roster, you don't write them off simply because they could be injured by one play -- anyone could. Or, they could turn out to have a defective heart. Shit happens.
    http://www.pollsb.com/photos/40/415000-william_wallace_mel_gibson_braveheart.jpg FREEEEEEEMAN!!!!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    10,397
    Rep Power
    1319536

    Default

    We need another RB capable of starting, but we should hit FA (Caddy maybe) AND later rounds of the draft. The team has too many more immediate needs.
    Last edited by Bucaroo Bonzai; 02-14-2012 at 04:27 PM.
    TE's don't "lead teams to playoffs", tootsie. Winslow is a match-up nightmare for opposing defense each week, and last season within a crippled offense and vanilla scheme he ended up ranked 7th among all NFL TEs. He is not the problem. Indeed, he is part of the solution. Next.. -Snook 4/26/2012


  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    7,179
    Rep Power
    291622

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NNUD28 View Post
    A fast receiver that can catch the ball would be nice also we need to stretch the field every now and again
    Sure, lots of things would be nice. But the Bucs have so many needs that they won't fill them all this year. I'm much more willing to go one more year with Williams and Benn under new leadership than I am Lumpkin, Quincy Black, or EJ Biggers.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Bradenton, FL
    Posts
    1,332
    Rep Power
    32895

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Rich McKay Conspiracy View Post
    Sure, lots of things would be nice. But the Bucs have so many needs that they won't fill them all this year. I'm much more willing to go one more year with Williams and Benn under new leadership than I am Lumpkin, Quincy Black, or EJ Biggers.
    I couldn't agree more!

  17. #17
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Tampa, Florida, United States
    Posts
    15,471
    Rep Power
    143093

    Default

    I would say the only positions we are not "in need" are the kicking game and possibly QB.
    Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways - Crown Royal in one hand - stogie in the other - body thoroughly used up! Shouting, "Woo Hoo! What a ride!"

    TAILGATE ANYONE?


  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,488
    Rep Power
    1728993

    Default

    We need RBs. We need everything actually. That GM we've had running the team has us so well stocked, we're thin at every position, and in some cases, so uncompetitive as to be fodder for the laughing stockade. I wonder if he'll ask Schiano for some input as to what makes a good NFL football player.
    Last edited by RaheemDream; 02-14-2012 at 06:10 PM.


  19. #19
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,781
    Rep Power
    51149

    Default

    Draft a RB? Yes

    Not sold completely on Blount. Runs through arm tackles and likes to jump over low tacklers, but I would like to see him lower his shoulders and hit the hole. You know, really mow someone over. For the most part, I would rather have a back that could do it all.

    Positions we don't need? Kicker and Punter of course.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    11,026
    Rep Power
    1576581

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rook View Post
    We need an upgrade. Bringing Caddy is fine for depth but the Bucs need a Sproles style speedster that can block as well. One of the reasons why WD 40 worked is that both guys could protect the QB and catch passes. Alstott and Pittman were a pretty good tandem as well.

    I would like to see Blouunt learn how to block. The guy is big enough to lay a hurting on someone coming in. When Caddy first came in the NFL, he was a terrible blocker on third down. By 2009, it became one of his strengths as a RB. Caddy was able to pick up that skill despite two consecutive seasons of torn ACLs in 2007 and 2008. And Caddy was not the good receiver in his rookie season as he is now. Blount has been healthy. There is no excuse for him not picking up these skills.
    Blount plays the game too high to be an effective pass protector. He can get away with it running the ball but not pass protecting.
    You WILL bow down to The Artful Drafter

  21. #21
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    5,176
    Rep Power
    258329

    Default

    Am I the only one that thinks we need to find someone who makes Sucker Punch a backup? In my opinion, he's not a starter on a serious team. What I'd like to see is him playing the Brandon Jacobs role to Trent Richardson's or Doug Martin's Ahmad Bradshaw. SP doesn't run decisive enough for a guy who's as big as he is, can't block, and doesn't offer much in the passing game. Why are we discussing finding a compliment when we should be looking for an upgrade?
    I Mashed In Little League (updated 4/27 - 2013 NFL Draft - Day 3 Targets)

    You so much as eye-f**k another agent in this building, and I will deport you naked to the Taliban.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    City Of Angels
    Posts
    583
    Rep Power
    42767

    Default

    We need a change of pace back to compliment Blount. We need speed, which we lack in all positions, from WR, to CB's….

  23. #23
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    24,329
    Rep Power
    522175

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by talbuc View Post
    Am I the only one that thinks we need to find someone who makes Sucker Punch a backup? In my opinion, he's not a starter on a serious team. What I'd like to see is him playing the Brandon Jacobs role to Trent Richardson's or Doug Martin's Ahmad Bradshaw. SP doesn't run decisive enough for a guy who's as big as he is, can't block, and doesn't offer much in the passing game. Why are we discussing finding a compliment when we should be looking for an upgrade?
    Thousand percent agree Talbuc, been tootin that horn since Brandon Jacobs was a zygote. Definitely before your mock in 83 when I coulda went to state.
    "I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it." -Voltaire
    "Dont make me do it to you Dunny / Cause I over-do it..." -Jay-Z

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    8,020
    Rep Power
    1769257

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by talbuc View Post
    Am I the only one that thinks we need to find someone who makes Sucker Punch a backup?
    Nope. He had some great runs against mediocre competition his first year, which made appear to be a great answer. Considering he was signed off the street, we got our money's worth. His hesitancy and jump, stop, look approach to finding a hole needs a lot of coaching. He oes so much wrong fundamentally and makes up for it with strength and tackle braking ability in the open field. That formula has a really short shelf life.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,191
    Rep Power
    63531

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by talbuc View Post
    Am I the only one that thinks we need to find someone who makes Sucker Punch a backup? In my opinion, he's not a starter on a serious team. What I'd like to see is him playing the Brandon Jacobs role to Trent Richardson's or Doug Martin's Ahmad Bradshaw. SP doesn't run decisive enough for a guy who's as big as he is, can't block, and doesn't offer much in the passing game. Why are we discussing finding a compliment when we should be looking for an upgrade?
    No. You're definitely not the only one. I like your Trent Richardson take, I was dying for someone to mention his name in this thread. Should the bucs clear out room for a free agent RB and draft a RB? Yes. The unique advantage I see for the bucs is this year's draft should be pretty deep for RB. The Bucs don't have to overreach for the position but the position should be targeted.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •